Xellular Identity - All About Mobile Content & Marketing

Video Content Not Only For The Masses

Chris Albrecht from NewTeeVee reviewed a new start up called Big Think. According to Chris, 

"Big Think wants to become the YouTube for ideas. The site has experts like professor Steven Pinker, author Deepak Chopra, and Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer answering big questions on topics like identity, politics and media. The video answers to these questions are supposed to kick-start discussions with people like you and me who can post responses or comments."

"In a world in which everyone’s a pundit, it’s nice to see someone recognizing the value of experts, but I just can’t see Big Think taking off. It’s just…so…heavy. Questions like “How are language and identity connected?” or “Has capitalism run mmok?” require too much brainpower when I’m multi-tasking with my computer, and the answers are snippets, so the topic can’t be more fully explored. While I haven’t watched all the videos, the only “fun” on Big Think I came across was “Writing for the Harvard Lampoon,” and “What is the most lavish party you have been to?” It’s like I’m reading cartoons from The New Yorker — clever, but fun in a way that’s elitist. Ultimately the whole thing feels like a big Ivy League club that I’m not welcome in."

Putting the writers' negative impressions aside, Big Think have a very smart segmentation, aiming to the higher-end of the population and not necessarily to the masses. When evaluating start ups or new websites, one must differentiate between the relevance for him\her and the relevance for the target segment. Although Big Think might make some people feel as if they are in a big Ivy League club to which they are not welcomed, many others might feel at home. This is exactly what segmentation is all about – specifically tailoring products and services for designated populations. Of course people who do not belong to the relevant segment might feel left out. Otherwise it wouldn't be segmentation at all. This is precisely the reason why adults might feel left out when their children play with Barbies, or action figures. Or why career driven businessmen might feel out of place in a cooking course. Good segmentation. That's why.

The segment of choice for Big think, the higher-end, is a segment that spends hours online and is always on the search for quality resources and quality content; i.e. the high-end segment is also part of the addressable market for video content. While this segment might have been consuming "light" content, it is well-equipped to enjoy more complex messages and will probably appreciate "heavy" content.

Some examples of successful segmentations have already made their way into marketing textbooks (such as manufacturing different car models to address different segments). Video content as a market has already reached the masses (YouTube, MetaCafe etc'), therefore segmentation is the natural next step. Lately we started to see some players addressing specific segments, like 5min and now BigThink. So, if you feel left out, don't worry – some player will target your segment soon enough.

This post was originally posted on The Flixwagon Blog.

Samsung Tries To Go Social Web 2.0

I was just reading at Go2Web2.0 about Samsung & YouTube's NewYears project. Users are invited to answer one of following questions in a short video (less than 1 minute long):

1. Make a video that reveals the one word that is your personal theme for 2008
2. Reenact the best of worst thing that happened to you in 2007
3. What cool things have you done with your mobile phone this year?
4. In 2008 what kind of cool mobile phone should Samsong develop for you?

Users can browse the videos using Google map and pick videos by location.

I can easily answer question #4 and say that Samsung should embed the Flixwagon live mobile broadcasting service in all of the devices :)

***

From a marketing point of view, while it is nice to see a huge mobile consumer brand interacting with users, IMO this campaign is not appealing enough; or in other words -- it lacks any real added value for the users.

1. YouTube users can upload their own created content to YouTube any day, therefore there is not much of an offer here. Plus, the current Samsung campaign limits users' videos up to a minute long while YouTube allows up to 10 minutes and 100 MB.

2. There is no clear incentive. Best clips will gain...? What? Self expression? A sense of belonging to a community? The perceived value should be the clearest message in any campaign.

3. And the worst: while a mobile consumer brand is involved in this campaign, there is no use of the mobile channel. How come there is no mobile offering in this campaign? Samsung could easily offer that the best 3 clips will be available on the mobile; or best suggestions (answers to questions 3 and 4) will be taken into development; or best clips will win Samsung handsets... ?

Ringback Tones Promotions

Hi all,

Xmas is right around the corner with its creative ringback tone mass media campaigns... But before that, I didn't want to leave without acknowledgment a few RBT campaigns from the last two months.

First campaign is brought to you from Colombia. The Colombian mobile operator Tigo has partnered Sony BMG to promote its content in a leaflet inside CDs and DVDs. Now Colombian CD\DVD buyers can simply send the short code that appears on the leaflet via SMS and get their own Backtone (Tigo's service name for ringback tones). The most crucial factor in this campaign is the offered playlist -- it would be very clever to offer music of the same type as the bought CD\DVD.

The second campaign is brought to you from the US. American mobile operator Cingular the mew AT&T launched a huge "Win a trip for 2 to meet Fall Out Boy, 50 Cents or Taylor Swift" campaign. AT&T users are encouraged to "Find Your Tone-ality to Fit Your Personality" and download an Answer Tone (AT&T's service name for ringback tones) and apply. Then, "if the artist calls you and hears his or her own song, you've won!"

And I can't wait to see this year's ringback tones Xmas campaigns... now that's a treat :)

Pricing: THE "Make or Break" Factor

We've been asked many times - what is the right price for ringback tones? Should it be related to the price of ringtones? What parameters should be taken into consideration while determining the price? Those are great questions that I'll try to answer here, based on the experience and data that has been gathered from many operators worldwide.

In general, the ringback tones pricing model is based on a combination of these revenue streams:

• Content fee - the price that is paid for each selected tune.
• Monthly/daily fee - the price that is paid for operating/enabling the ringback tones service.
• Registration fee - a one time fee that is paid upon joining the service.
• Content expiration - some operators have a tune expiration date, which means that after X days the activated tune expires. If the subscriber won't buy a new tune after the old tune expires, the default "ring ring" will be assigned to his/her account. Usually operators notify the subscriber that his/her selected ringback tone is about to expire and will offer a new tune (for a full/reduced price).

These four streams join up to 3 common pricing models:

1) Content fee + Monthly/daily fee:
An AT&T user (for example) is charged $1.99 per tune + additional $0.99 of monthly fee for the Answer Tones service. The monthly fee is charged regardless of the number of Answer Tones ordered.

The benefits of this model are the constant revenue stream & quick return of investment (ROI) coming from the monthly fee. However, setting the right monthly fee is crucial; overcharging will lead to high churn rates.

2) Content fee + Content expiration:
An AMC user (for example) is charged 120 lekë ($1.41 USD) for content fee and the Fun Tune expires after 6 months.

The benefit of this model is the lower user resistance due to the lower (perceived) price for ringback tones. Content expiration increases awareness of the service (subscribers don't hear their own tune and many times they actually forget that they are subscribed to the service) and aims to generate more usage. When the tune expires, users are offered to purchase a new tune. At this point users are actually reminded that they have been subscribed to the ringback tones service which leads to 2 scenarios: a) users choose to opt-in and buy a new tune (i.e. pay the content fee) or b) users are reminded that they have been subscribed to a service that they no longer want and they opt-out. Unfortunately, many users choose to opt out, causing higher service churn rates.

Operators that use this pricing model are strongly recommended to have a good renewal system which offers the user a new tune upon the expiration date and provide an easy and intuitive purchasing experience (usually via SMS with deep linking). The importance of the renewal system is greater as the tune's "shelf life" is shorter. Also, it should be based on intuitive call for action.

3) Content fee + Registration fee:
A Kyivstar user (for example) is charged 7,30 UAH ($1.45 USD) upon joining the D-Jingle service (one time payment for activating the service) + additional 7,30 UAH ($1.45 USD) for each tune. All tunes expire after 3 months.

This model is less popular among operators as it generates lower revenue stream for the operator. Also, at the first purchase, subscriber is charged for two payments (content fee and registration fee) at once, making the perceived price relatively high.

To summarize, each of these models has it advantages and disadvantages but there is no correlation between the pricing model & the ringback tones service take-up; however, there is correlation between price & service take-up, the price is THE "make or break" factor, as you can see in the following diagram:

Effective Pricing - Guidelines:

While there is no single winning recipe for ringback tones pricing, we do have some recommendations and guidelines for effective pricing. First and most important, the ringback tones price should be:

• Affordable - based on subscribers' capabilities
• Perceived as fair - compared with other operators & services

How can you make sure the price is affordable and perceived as fair?

Factor	Recommendation
Competitors	Lower or equal to competitors' price
Ringtones	<monthly fee + content fee> should be 30% below or above ringtones price
Monthly ARPU	<monthly fee + content fee> should be lower than 20% of ARPU
Average Prepaid card	Users should be able to pay monthly fee & purchase ringback tones along with their other voice & data expenses

And one last tip: if you don't have it already - create and promote a "promotion" category with a lower price. The promotion items can include the new single the music label is currently promoting, music covers, a discount for the first purchase etc'.

The Fun Dial Marketing Seminar - First Coverage

Back in 2002 was the first introduction of customized ringback tones, made by the South Korean operator SK Telecom with its 'Color Ring' ringback tones service. SK Telecom generated over €80 million (US$100 million) in Q2 2002 and has reached 54% of SK Telecom's 18 million subscribers in penetration.

Despite of the cold welcoming of operators in Europe and America, today Ringback Tones is becoming one of the biggest mobile entertainment revenue generators. In some operators Ringback tones are overtaking ringtones sales. In Europe and North America there’s a 60%-80% of Ringback Tone potential end-user-coverage, at least one operator in each Western European country and almost all in North America has already launched the service. Also analysts forecast a substantial ringback tones market growth in the upcoming years.

 

At present, most of the operators are facing various challenges in the way to increase Ringback Tones service penetration, create on going usage of content, increase the awareness and in general turn Ringback tones into a more successful service. Understanding operators' needs and challenges Comverse Fun Dial (Comverse’s Ringback Tone brand) team came up with the idea to hold the second ever marketing seminar focusing the European market. The Fun Dial Seminar brought together leading industry experts, mobile operators, (some that have already launched the service and some which are on the process of launching), as well as content providers, music labels and managed services providers to facilitate an environment of knowledge sharing and to create an open forum to discuss burning issues related to Ringback Tones.

For those of you who weren't able to attent the Seminar, I will cover here some of the study cases presented at the Seminar:

• How to turn the Ringback Tone into a successful service generating significant revenue?
•Case studies of successful Ringback Tone marketing strategies led by mobile operators
• Opening the ringback tones service to 3rd party content providers.

You're welcome to tune in every Tuesday for a part of this series!

Back in 2002 was the first introduction of customized ringback tones, made by the South Korean operator SK Telecom with its 'Color Ring' ringback tones service. SK Telecom generated over €80 million (US$100 million) in Q2 2002 and has reached 54% of SK Telecom's 18 million subscribers in penetration.

Despite of the cold welcoming of operators in Europe and America, today Ringback Tones is becoming one of the biggest mobile entertainment revenue generators. In some operators Ringback tones are overtaking ringtones sales. In Europe and North America there’s a 60%-80% of Ringback Tone potential end-user-coverage, at least one operator in each Western European country and almost all in North America has already launched the service. Also analysts forecast a substantial ringback tones market growth in the upcoming years.

 

At present, most of the operators are facing various challenges in the way to increase Ringback Tones service penetration, create on going usage of content, increase the awareness and in general turn Ringback tones into a more successful service. Understanding operators' needs and challenges Comverse Fun Dial (Comverse’s Ringback Tone brand) team came up with the idea to hold the second ever marketing seminar focusing the European market. The Fun Dial Seminar brought together leading industry experts, mobile operators, (some that have already launched the service and some which are on the process of launching), as well as content providers, music labels and managed services providers to facilitate an environment of knowledge sharing and to create an open forum to discuss burning issues related to Ringback Tones.

For those of you who weren't able to attent the Seminar, I will cover here some of the study cases presented at the Seminar:

• How to turn the Ringback Tone into a successful service generating significant revenue?
•Case studies of successful Ringback Tone marketing strategies led by mobile operators
• Opening the ringback tones service to 3rd party content providers.

You're welcome to tune in every Tuesday for a part of this series!

Focus on Mobile Avatars - Mobagetown Japan

After answering a few readers queries through email, I realized that there is a growing reader's interest in mobile offering of avatars. Therefore, I decided to reply in a series of posts for the benefit of others who might be interested as well.

One of my favorite examples of a smart business model and a VERY successful avatar service is Mobile Game Town (Mobagetown) from Japan. It is the largest and fastest growing mobile Social Networking Service (SNS), available only on mobile. The site is a blend of casual games and social networking, multiplayer and singleplayer games coupled with chat, blogs and avatars.

An interesting fact is that Mobile Game Town is offered by DeNA, a Tokyo-based e-commerce company that runs virtual auction sites and shopping malls. This fact leaves a notable footmark on the business model (and makes a differentiator from other SNS sites). DeNA hooks the users with free mobile games with over 30 titles to choose from, supported by advertisement. Users buy from mobile e-commerce sites and get “mobile gold” which is then used to dress their avatars; by spending in the real world users get virtual money to dress their virtual alter ego, their avatar.

[via DeNA]

Mobile Game Town’s success is overwhelming: 5 million users with over 400 million daily page views back in May in less than a year from its official launch. Just to put the numbers in perspective, Mobile Game Town’s stats are four times larger than that of Yahoo's mobile portal! 

And to give you a sense of latest (brilliant) marketing activities:

In June, DeNA announced "an interesting summer Yukata campaign. In co-operation with Aeon  dept. store the companies have set-up a virtual avatar catalogue from which members can build, for a modest fee, their outfit based on actual products complete with best dressed contest prizes. This would seem to be a rather slick ad campaign ultimately designed to drive purchases of the real thing just in time for the summer matsuri (festival) season. The company ran a similar campaign for Nike where customers who bought physical goods were rewarded with virtual prizes."

[via Wireless World Japan]

And a special treat from the Wireless Watch Japan - a video demo of both "Mobile Game Town" and Disney's "Wonder Days" (which will be reviewed here on its own in one of my next posts).

College Students Are More Open to Mobile Advertizing

According to a new study from Ball State, "Technically oriented college students are increasingly receptive to receiving advertising via text messages on their cell phones and other mobile devices".

"An analysis of mobile communications by college students during 2005-07 found that 56.3% of respondents would accept ads if they would get something free, said Michael Hanley, a Ball State advertising professor and mobile marketing researcher.

About 37.4% of college students said it would only take the offer of a free ringtone for them to would accept advertisements on their cell phones while 21.4% preferred a discount or coupon to a restaurant, movie or grocery store and 20% wanted free minutes, upgrades, access to the Internet or music."
[via MobiAd Network]

Update: Continuing on the search for analysis about mobile advertizing I found this (which I think supports the findings from above):

Acording to a study by media agency Universal McCann "people always complain about things that are interruptive - it still works in traditional media but in this environment consumers have so much choice where they source content from and if it detracts from the experience they will go elsewhere.

The survey, which covered 9,500 people with a mobile phone and an internet connection in 21 countries from the UK to Mexico, suggests the marketing opportunity to reach gadget users is bigger than ever.

Consumers in the developing world were the most receptive to advertising, particularly Mexico, China and Thailand, while the US, France and the UK were the least receptive markets. On a mobile phone, the best forms of advertising were opt-in Bluetooth formats that provide information or vouchers direct to the mobile, popular with 72% of the global sample, and sponsored search results. Adverts on mobile internet pages and TV adverts on mobiles were rejected by 61% of respondents.

For podcasts and videocasts, sponsorship was the most valued form of advertising, followed by brand recommendations from presenters. Adverts at the beginning of the clip were acceptable but interruptive ads in the middle of a video or audio clip were not."

[via The Guardian]

Harnessing Blogs for Marketing Campaigns

Hi all,

I was invited to give a presentation about blogging from a marketer's perspective. As a blogger, I get many press releases sent to my inbox everyday, hoping to get featured. However, many of them are irrelevant to my field of expertise and to the topics I cover at my blog. Eventually, many of those press releases find their way to my trash can...

At the ordered lecture, I want to present examples of smart and creative marketing campaigns that harnessed the power of popular blogs for marketing goals. I started to search the web and found this amazing story at Word of Mouth Marketing Association website:

"Toyota recently completed a campaign in which it engaged a team of Greek bloggers to spread the word about its new hatchback model, the Auris. Toyota wanted three things from its Greek Auris campaign. One, it needed to be digital. Two, it needed to put the car's interior -- its "cockpit" -- front and center. And three, it needed to inspire test-drives and get consumers into the driver's seat.

To achieve its goals, Toyota decided to let its customers market the Auris for it. It invited 15 Greek bloggers to test-drive the car for a week, and encouraged them to post their findings to an official Auris Blog as well as to their own blogs. The results:

* Bloggers wrote 55 posts about the Auris.

* Readers posted 175 comments to the bloggers' posts.

* The Auris Blog received 52,000 visits from 41,000 unique visitors.

* The campaign generated 2,000 test-drive requests -- 50% of all test-drive requests."

[via WOMMA]

If you have more examples of this kind of marketing activities - please contact me. I promise to give you full credit for it :)

The Mobile Content Market - Moving Into An Off-Portal Eco-System

Mobile Content Market - 30,000 ft. View 

Communication, entertainment, information… consumer interest in using mobile phones has amazingly grown worldwide over the past few years. Mobile Content, the fast growing market in mobile, is expected to grow from $18bn in 2005 (Informa Telecoms & Media, July 2006) to $42.8bn in 2010:

• Music - $11.4bn
• Mobile Games - $11.2bn
• Gambling - $7.6bn
• Adult Content - $2.3bn
• WAP Browsing, Infotainment, dating and other applications - rest of market

The mobile industry lead by the mobile operators has spent a lot of $$ to encourage growth of the mobile content market. By establishing the first content-based services, operators put the cornerstone and made content available to their subscribers through their own web portals both for the web and mobile.

all rights reserved to John Puterbaugh, Nellymoser Inc.

[Figure 1]

Initiating the first content-based services has positioned operators as the storefront of the mobile content stores, offering a wide offering (see figure 2 and 3).

[Figure 2]

all rights reserved to John Puterbaugh, Nellymoser Inc.

[Figure 3 ]

Operator portals have been important for being the first milestone, however they have provided limited opportunities. Operators maintain a wide portfolio of mobile products and services while maintaining a reach portal is too demanding for most. This has led to a gradual opening of the market to many more players who share the load (and profits).

The Off-Portal Eco-System

Thanks to this process operators have witnessed that content providers ultimately sustain consumer interest by providing a large variety of compelling content, being constantly updated with the newest hits. Today, the appetite among content providers to leverage the mobile outlet is higher than ever, seeing each month new content brands entering the mobile market. Just as in the early days of the Web, when users initially experienced the online world through a web portal before exploring out to find what they seek, we are now starting to see increasingly wide browsing behavior amongst mobile users.

This consumer activity is increasingly channeled outside of the operator portal. These two channels to market - through an operator portal, or directly to the consumer by the brand itself - are complementary drivers to the total growth in mobile data usage. In most of the off-portal services, the operator is still part of the billing process, providing a simple payment experience. The differences are that the operator does not promote the service in its own portal, and the marketing is managed by the content provider.

The most popular discovery method for off-portal services is the common short codes which enable users to interact using SMS as an entry point into content/services provided by parties other than operators. Phone users then are charged directly to their mobile phone bill. The main services powered by common short codes today are ringtones, wallpapers, games, news alerts and voting applications.
Today, common short codes are the only ubiquitous cross-operator method of marketing off-portal content, being available to all mobile subscribers.

Off-Portal: Everybody Wins

The off-portal channel to market is very attractive; it brings more brands and services into the mobile market, providing wider choice and usage opportunities for mobile users. It also provides a route into the market for more specialized content providers that cannot access the market through operator portals.

Brands of all sizes can invest marketing dollars into campaigns with a single call-to-action that works for practically all mobile users using short codes. They can also leverage their websites traffic to generate mobile usage. And most important for consumer brands, it enables them to clearly differentiate from their competitors through creative marketing.Operators on their behalf, enjoy a growing income from SMS and data traffic with 0 cost of marketing since content providers take care of the marketing to the end consumers. And consumers, from their point of view, enjoy the same mobile services across multiple operator networks.

The off-portal mobile content market is a vital part of the mobile data market. The marketing benefit – reaching mobile users everywhere, regardless of their network, is a strong driver for brands to route their marketing efforts to the off-portal channel and to incorporate mobile services to their marketing campaigns.

*Figure 1 and 3 were used with the curtsey of John Puterbaugh from Nellymoser Inc.

Frank Dickson of iSuppli: Strong Long Term Growth Lies in the Mobile Full-Track-Downloads

Hi all,

Welcome to the second part of the mobile content coverage.

Today, Frank Dickson from iSuppli will be visiting here. Frank is Principal Analyst, Multimedia Content Services. He covers markets for digital video and home entertainment, with focus areas including IPTV, video on demand, home networking and broadband video.

Hi Frank. How are you today?
Life is good. Thanks for asking.

What has been successful to date and what promises to sell in the future?
In addition to premium content, messaging continues to grow strongly worldwide but with significant regional variation. The mature country markets of Western Europe and Asia saw growth, but the growth in the Americas almost astounding. Growth is strongest among the US operators, several of which saw revenue associated with messaging double in 2006 compared to 2005. Messaging growth is being driven by both increased p2p messaging usage as well as increased premium SMS associated with mobile content purchases and participative TV.

What are the key drivers for market growth for different types of mobile content and entertainment?
The future is all about video! The mobile video market continues to develop, but remains highly fragmented on nearly all fronts. Business models are uncertain. Technology standards are uncertain.  Consumer usage models are uncertain. Content rights need to be resolved. Geographic differences are significant in both content consumption and regulatory environment. As a result, the mobile video market will take time to develop, but offers the biggest potential upside. Competitors across the value chain should participate early to learn and develop a position in the market. Competitors should set expectations appropriately for a highly volatile market with high uncertainty in the short term. Agility will be key to adapt to rapid change.

Many state that widespread consumer demand has lagged after a rapid penetration rate. Why? What are the barriers for market growth of market for mobile content?
The major barrier to growth of mobile content is leakage, as in revenue leakage. Approximately, 5% to 10% of transactions turn out as bad transactions due to fraud, lack of funds on a prepaid card or delivery problems. Another 5% to 15% of good transactions result in refunds due to shady marketing practices, overly protective wireless operators not wanting a customer to have a bad content experience or a lack of transaction visibility for customer service. Wait, did I mention the customer service support call costs? There is money leaking everywhere.

One of the problems is that the wireless operators want to be in the center of the purchase experience.  The billing systems however are built to service reoccurring wireless subscription customers. Wireless operators making themselves the nexus of mobile commerce transactions creates a problem as they are now providing high volume transaction clearing services like those provided by Visa, PayPal and others.  Frankly, processing financial transactions is not at the heart of their distinctive competencies.

How will the services evolve over time?
The mobile music market is among the most dynamic content categories worldwide. Polyphonic ringtones are receding with a transition to realtones. However, on a worldwide basis, the overall ringtone category appears to be slowing. 

Ringback tones continue to gain strength in Asia, but haven't migrated significantly to other geographic regions yet. Video ringtones are among the newest services positioned as a next-generation ringtone.
The emergence of full track download music services continues, with operators worldwide deploying services. Dramatic growth of these services remains mixed regionally and by operator. Consumers are still slow to build awareness, while operators have significant challenges to put together a cohesive and easy-to-use full track music storefront. Overall, in the emerging battle between music phones and mp3/pmp players, the music store and music delivery platform still significantly favors mp3-oriented services. 

What applications will drive the market in the next few years?
We believe that there is strong long term growth in the mobile full-track-download market. However, outside of Asia, the inflection point for dramatic growth is still developing. Overall, iSuppli reduced it’s full track download forecast in this quarters tracker, while increasing our outlook for mobile music streaming services. Full track downloads will continue to be among the strongest mobile content markets, while streaming music services will segment the market somewhat and take advantage the subscription-based business model which aligns ideally with mobile operator business models.

For example, we did end-user primary research to provide more insight into consumer demand.  Approximately two-third so respondents listened to music on they PMP; however, only 10% listened on their phones. This suggests their may be some struggle converting individuals from a usage specific device mentality to unbiquitious device mentality.

A big thanks to Frank Dickson for this great interview! :)

You Asked, We Answered

Today we have a an interview with Comverse Fun Dial marketing experts, Audelia Boker and Inbal Rosenberg, and Scott Manthey of JabberTones will be asking the questions!

Scott: Why have ringback tones in general been the red headed step child in the content mobile industry? I have felt that the hype in the industry after real tone/master tone debate and the never found app skipped right onto video when ringbacks were today and video is still tomorrow. Is it the carriers (b/c there is no competition= no marketing?) The content producers (figured the carriers would advertise for them?)
Audelia: For a long time, the only players that were able to market ringback tones were the operators since it's a network service. Therefore, B2C players such as content aggregators couldn't take part in the business and promote the service. This is about to change, with content mobile players stepping in.

Scott: Why haven't the enterprise sector jumped into ringback space - branding their company cell phones without spending on a pbx?
Inbal: I think it all depends on how aggressively the operator is marketing the service to this segment. We know of operators that 20% out of their ringback tones users are corporate users.
Xen: There are some mobile operators that have realized that the business is a relevant segment for ringback tones. For example, Orange IL targeted its business customers and provided a suiting offering -- to turn the ringback tone into a channel to communicate with wide audience. Many big sized companies use the corporate ringback tone as another channel of advertising (and play their advertising campaign), small and medium sized businesses, which have smaller budgets for advertising, use their company’s ringback tones to position themselves as creative, dynamic, cool and promising companies.

Scott: In terms of trends of ringback tones purchasing, is there a correlation with handsets or computer usage or any customer habits outside the mobile arena?
Audelia: Not that we know of. We are more aware of a correlation with other mobile types of usage (SMS usage, games, etc…).

Scott: I have heard that the beast selling ringback tones are movie themes - is this consistent with your data? How is the content different than the top selling ringtones? More voice tones? More music? I really care more about the content that is not being driven by a marketing campaign - A team theme song for instance.
Audelia: It very much depends on the country specificities. Overall, we know that most successful ringback tones are music related. But in some countries (e.g. Turkey, China) jokes are very successful too.

Scott: Can we compare the adoption curve in the US to Asia with the overall marketing budgets and educational campaigns?
Audelia: No. In Asia, more or less from day1, all operators and content providers invested in the service. Therefore awareness grew almost over night and service adoption was much faster.

Scott: Do you think there is a correlation between the age of ringback tones users and the fact that ringback tones are only for post paid? Whereas ringtone sales are for both pre and post paid?
Audelia: RBT are not only for post paid in most countries in the world. If that's the case in the US, it certainly has an impact on the average age of RBT users.
Xen: We run into a great example of Hutch, the Indian mobile operator, which sells ringback tones for prepaid with Fun Cards. Here is the TV ad:

Scott: How many telcos have a pre paid ringback tones service? I know Telefonica launched with Comverse but are there any elsewhere in the world?
Inbal: yes. Most operators in APAC & Eastern Europe have prepaid ringback tones service as in most cases over 80% of their users are prepaid.

Scott: Overall is the ringback tone service a less developed service than sms b/c essentially it is a voicemail technology and carriers have little faith in old technology?
Audelia: What do you mean by voicemail technology? Ringback tones is less developed mostly because it has no functional benefit, whereas SMS obviously do. Moreover, ringback tones require constant marketing efforts, whereas it's not the case for SMS. So it's less a matter of faith and more a matter of efforts required in order to promote the service and generate revenues.

Thank you Scott, Audelia and Inbal for this spontaneous interview! :) If you have further questions, feel free to send them over.

Seamus McAteer of M:Metrics on the Ringback Tones Market (Part III)

Welcome to the third part of the ringback tones coverage. Today, Seamus McAteer will be visiting here. Seamus is a co-founder, chief product architect and senior analyst at M:Metrics. Seamus has covered the wireless industry since the early 1990s and has earned a reputation as one of the most respected and credible analysts in the industry. He held director and research fellow positions in several corporations analyzing internet and communications technology before founding his own wireless and telecommunications advisory services firm. He is frequently sought by the media for expert commentary on wireless, Internet and related technologies.

If you missed the previous two part here are the links: the first part and second part.

Seamus, the stage is yours:

Hi Seamus. Thank you for visiting Xellular Identity :) How are you?
Great, thanks :)

What kind of business models exist today in the ringback tones market?
Pricing for Ringbacks can vary quite considerably. Most operators charge a monthly fee of between 99 cents for Cingular and Verizon and $1.49 for T-Mobile. Sprint charges $2.50 for use of a tone for a 90 day period. Some operators such as Boost charge a monthly subscription fee for use of a song. Again, like the issue with lots of different names, lots of different pricing schemes has got to create some confusion.

Labels like Ringback tones because it yields a nice recurring revenue stream and they get a nice royalty payment as operators will use a label-owned recording by the artist, this is not the case for poly tones for example. As a result labels can expect so share north of 30% of the retail revenue in most major markets.

Do you see correlation between market adoption and churn for ringback tones?
Comparing adoption rates and churn across markets it is evident that as adoption climbs churn falls. For example Spain has the highest level of adoption among the markets with track with about 10% of Spanish mobile subscribers over 13 reportedly using the service and it has the lowest churn rate of about 12% in a month. Italy has the highest churn of over 20% monthly and the lowest rate of adoption after the UK at about 3%.

Any examples of marketing best practices?
Verizon has the highest level of awareness and lowest churn for ringback services in the US. Its packaging of the services has been effective – it uses an introductory notification to tell the caller that their party is being reached. It’s launch was also effective, it worked closely with Warner Music on a mutual campaign.

Anything else to add to this interview?
Nothing, except that it was nice to hang out with you and the Comverse team at your customer event in Miami to talk about theories of social networking and the ringback market!

A big thanks to Seamus for his willingness to put the time and effort to convert his presentation given at the Fun Dial marketing Seminar (April 2007, Miami) into an interview and share with us all. :)

Seamus McAteer of M:Metrics on the Ringback Tones' Market

Welcome to the second part of the ringback tones coverage. Today, Seamus McAteer will be visiting here. Seamus is a co-founder, chief product architect and senior analyst at M:Metrics. Seamus has covered the wireless industry since the early 1990s and has earned a reputation as one of the most respected and credible analysts in the industry. He held director and research fellow positions in several corporations analyzing internet and communications technology before founding his own wireless and telecommunications advisory services firm. He is frequently sought by the media for expert commentary on wireless, Internet and related technologies.

If you missed the first part, just follow this link.

Well, let's welcome Seamus:

Hi Seamus. Thank you for visiting Xellular Identity :) How are you?
Great, thanks :)

What are the market size estimates for ringback tones?
M:Metrics tracks use by end-users not revenues. In terms of overall usage we are talking about a service that was being used by about 9 million or so subscribers in the US in April, which is a doubling over the prior year.

How significant contributors to the overall revenue are the ringback tones to be in the future?
If adoption creeps up to about 20% in five years -- which is feasible --  then we are talking about a market with 50 million users spending about $3.50 per month if we account for increased switching and purchase of new songs etc. as people get more used to the service. Then we are talking about a market worth $2.1 billion just in the US. Not bad but still only 1% of all revenue. Ringbacks will be one component of the mobile music market which will include full tracks, music videos, video tones, and master tones. Music is a strategic priority for operators along with video, games, mobile Web, and advertising.

What are the barriers for market growth of ringback tones?
I think that the big barrier for growth in the market is marketing and education. We are getting beyond the early adopter stage where there is really significant social risk associated with use of ringbacks and people are confused when they hear a ringback and hang up. This is particularly the case among subscribers under 35 years of age. To get beyond the early adopter group there needs to be clearer marketing of the service and simplified pricing. The fact that there is no accepted consumer friendly generic name for the category is a real breather of confusion. The term Ringback is actually used as a brand name by Verizon and other operators have shied from using it.

Who are the major players?
Among operators in the US Verizon and T-Mobile, which launched services towards the end of 2004, have a lead in the market with adoption among their base of about 7%. Verizon leads on a market share basis given its substantially larger base of subscribers. Sprint is next in the market in terms of conversion with about 5% of its base.

The major players among vendors are RealNetworks through its acquisition of WiderThan and Comverse. NMS would be another major vendor in the market.

Thank you Seamus :)
Seamus will be here next Tuesday with more of M:Metrics insights about the American market of ringback tones -- so don't forget tune in!

Sprite Ventures Into Mobile Social Networking

Targeting youth, the Coca-Cola Company announced the launch of “Sprite Yard”, a mobile social network. The Sprite Yard will enable users to send messages, chat, download content and share photos. The official launch is set for the 1st of June at China and 22nd of June at the USA.

To register as a new user, you need to text "YARD" to short code 59666, enter a tag name and password; upon completing the registration process, users may create public profiles, compile buddy lists, detail activities in the Planner and send short messages, or Shouts. In addition, Sprint Yard will offer exclusive content like visitones (visual ringtones combining images and music) and animated mobisodes.

What I liked is that awareness will be driven through PIN codes contained in the bottle caps (and not through mass media campaigns)! According to the company, Coca-Cola sells 10 billion single-serve bottles globally each year, providing a powerful activation mechanism for its promotional initiatives.

Only a limited amount of consumer brands have ventured into creating a social network, let alone a mobile one… It will be interesting to follow Sprite Yard's success (or failure). Any speculations?

[via press release]

Mobicious: One Part iTunes, One Part Google

Back in January, Michele MacKenzie of Ovum, addressed the key challenges wireless players are facing when growing the wireless content market:

“The market place for mobile content was dominated, in earlier years, by the closed portals of the mobile operators. Those days are over now. We estimate that in Europe 50-70% of content revenues are driven from outside the operator-branded portal. […]An on portal and off portal strategy are not mutually exclusive, they complement each other and are both needed. The walled garden is no longer viable: a single portal will not meet all of consumers’ growing demands. And operators benefit from off-portal content too: it drives revenues from data traffic, and we believe it will also help open the way for advertising revenues going forward.

Mobicious, who just launched this week, try to put the described above into practice; “Mobicious” (a name that came  about by squeezing “ambitious,” “delicious” and “mobile” together) hopes to be the best place for mobile phone users to discover mobile content and services.

How? Mobicious offers a diverse listings of mobile content like mobile services, ringtones, wallpapers, weather alerts and video games. By “diverse listings of mobile content” they mean both on-portal and off-portal mobile content.

Having the mobile consumer in mind, Mobicious wants to be the one place to find everything for your mobile phone, including paid-for and free content, on-deck and off-deck. When particular item costs money to download, Mobicious sends the user directly to the company’s own online store. By This, Mobicious actually addresses the mobile content discovery problem and tries to simply it. Things are simpler when all content is under one directory which includes support, forums, ratings, reviews, and help. Mobicious also copes with consumers fear from hidden phone bill charges when downloading content from off-portals - by deep linking into the content owners’ download pages in case the item has a price tag.

To put things to the test I searched Mobicious for “Madonna” (note that the service is currently available only to US users). As you can see at the screenshot below, I can download pictures and ringers of Madonna, some for free and some require a plan:

 

You can also try the Mobicious mobile web page by pointing your mobile browser to www.mobicious.com.

And last thing, on the business side,

"Mobicious’ business plan is twofold: selling ads on its Web site and taking a cut, about 10 percent to 15 percent, of purchases made that originated from its site. Since the company won’t charge upfront fees, and will make it easier for people to buy features, cell phone carriers are mostly welcoming the idea of sharing revenue, Chang said. “It’s a really easy sales pitch,” he said."

[via the Boston Hearald]

Mix Sherpa: A New Mobile Music Discovery Service

Hi all,

Today I wanted to review a very creative campaign done by Sprint to promote its new mobile music store called Mix Sherpa.

Sprint was looking for a way to create buzz and raise awareness for their recently launched Music Store in an already very crowded space with Verizon's, T-Mobile's and The New AT&T's (Cingular) music download stores. Also, the audience of "Advanced Connected", which Sprint wanted to reach, is extremely averse to traditional advertising and blatant promotion.

So how did Sprint manage these challenges?

The human\social angle - Sprint invented a whole story about 2 characters:
Ias Westbury, a washed up pop star from the 1980s running a record store on Melrose and DJ Supahboy5 who works at Ian’s store. To make the story seem more real, Ian even has his own myspace page and a music video for Ian’s one and only hit from the 80s called “Under the Moon” [which was directed by the music video legend Nigel Dick, (Tears For Fears, Guns N’ Roses, Britney Spears)].

The added value to the user - Sprint integrated a discovery and recommendation engine into the story about Ian:
Users engage with Ian and the DJ by creating their own playlists and in return getting an “expert” review of their choices. Users also get recommendations based on the newly created playlist. The added value for the users is the discovery of new music that fits their tastes and the reaffirmation of who they are and what their musical taste says about them.

Finally, piling a playlist and getting exposed to new music while interacting with a cool character will (hopefully) generate Sprint music downloads! Who wouldn't want to take the playlist to the mobile? Especially if the recommendations will prove themselves as precise, or in Ian's words:

"You go to the site and select your own custom playlist. Through the magic they call a “logic engine” - I'm able to analyze your playlist - and maybe analyze what's going on in that head of yours too. I'll offer you everything in my arsenal with humor, wit and charm - naturally. My longtime employee DJ Supahboy5 is also online to interject with his own opinions on songs and styles. We've got information on bands and songs, and links to download everything you need to take your mobile phone to the next level“.

As for the mobile part, Sprint offers "Sprint Music Manager" which is PC client that helps you sync your music from your PC to your mobile using a USB cord. As I don’t have a Sprint phone (I don't live in the US) I asked to get a demo account to try the new service. However, if someone gets the opportunity to play with it in the meantime, please share your experience and insights! :)

Ringback Tones: The Future Digital Music Distribution Channel?

"The overall value of the worldwide music industry has been in decline for several years, falling from a high-point of $39.7 billion USD in 2000 to just $32.1 billion USD in 2006." This is the main drive for the music labels to look for new outlets. One of them is the mobile music market. Lately, we have been witnessing a new marketing approach on behalf of the music labels; the ringtone and ringback tone have started to replace the old single played at the radio stations. Music labels now have been providing exclusivity for new singles mobile operators for a limited time, many times before the album has been even released.

What are the benefits of using this method?

• For the users - users are attracted to the exclusive and hot ringback tone and want to have the latest and hottest new song;
• For the operators - operators create more awareness to the ringback tones service, they generate more usage and hopefully more penetration of the ringback tones service. Also they are perceived as innovative, cool, updated with the current music… And, let's not forget that later on, after the exclusive ringback tone expires, they will notify the users and offer a new ringback tone and so on…
• For the music labels - music labels get the public to spread the word about and play the new release, i.e. increase awareness to the new song and drive sales later on when the album is out.

In Malaysia,

"pop singer Misha Omar released 2 singles as a digital single/truetone, some three months before the scheduled full album release. "This is the way the industry is moving. It looks like we will be doing it for all of our artistes," said Sony BMG managing director for Malaysia, Adrian Lim. Warner Music's new media development manager Wong Mei Chen said the company is also walking down the same path. "That's the trend that the business is going into. You'll be seeing more of that. You'll hear it as a ringtone before you hear it on radio." Wong cited examples like Linkin Park where the ringtone for the What I've Done single, which was released two months before the Minutes to Midnight album in May."

[via The Star Online, Thanks Gabi!]

However, this trend is not limited only to the more advanced Asian markets; some popular international acts are even beginning to sell more ringtones than albums: The Pussycat Dolls, for example, sold close to 80,000 ringtones of songs like "Don't Cha and Beep" while their album only sold about 50,000 copies."
[via The Star Online]

Also, In the past, I presented here another 2 international examples:

• American operator Sprint has used this marketing strategy when it offered, EXCLUSIVELY, Pearl Jam's "World Wide Suicide" single both as ringback tone (Caller Tone) and ringtone.

• And Orange France offered Johnny Hallyday's new ringback tone (Fun Tone) "La loi du silence" exclusively to its users. And here's the clip:

Seems like ringback tones might be the future digital music distribution channel. Any comments? :)

Ringback Tones: The APAC Operators Cash Cow

The Ringback tone service has been highly successful ever since its early launching days back in 2002. The first introduction of customized ringback tones was made by the South Korean operator SK Telecom with its 'Color Ring' ringback tones service. SK Telecom generated over €80 million (US$100 million) in Q2 2002 and has reached 54% of SK Telecom's 18 million subscribers in penetration. In the Asian market in general, the ringback tones service has maintained an average of 20% service penetration across the board, with some operators reporting up to 50% penetration.

Ongoing content usage is a key success factor to the strong ringback tone business case, and content consumption is also very high in Asia. Operators in the region report that customers frequently change their content to fit their mood, style, musical taste and just for fun. Nevertheless, it is amazing to witness the amazing ongoing uptake of ringback tones in APAC today:

"A leading wireless internet company in China recently published its results for Q1 2007, among them its Colour Ringback Tones service results:

Out of total revenues of US$35.14 million in 1Q 07, the Colour Ringback Tones Service’s revenues were US$3.35 M, which are 10.5% of the total wireless Internet service revenues in the quarter. This figure is an up of 45.6% quarter over quarter and up 36.2% year over year. Colour Ringback Tones revenues made up.

The company also states that the Colour Ringback Tones business “continued to increase quarter over quarter due to Chinese New Year related and other event driven promotional activities with mobile operator partners. While Colour Ringback Tones revenues increased year over year due to our expanding relationship with China Mobile's centralized music platform and continued declines in the average unit price of Colour Ringback Tones, stimulating end-user demand."

[via Sys-con Media]

As you can see, the ringback tones service has been and still is a “cash cow” for APAC operators. Hopefully will see more European and American operators reaching these great numbers as well.