« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

Pricing: THE "Make or Break" Factor

We've been asked many times - what is the right price for ringback tones? Should it be related to the price of ringtones? What parameters should be taken into consideration while determining the price? Those are great questions that I'll try to answer here, based on the experience and data that has been gathered from many operators worldwide.

In general, the ringback tones pricing model is based on a combination of these revenue streams:

  • Content fee - the price that is paid for each selected tune.
  • Monthly/daily fee - the price that is paid for operating/enabling the ringback tones service.
  • Registration fee - a one time fee that is paid upon joining the service.
  • Content expiration - some operators have a tune expiration date, which means that after X days the activated tune expires. If the subscriber won't buy a new tune after the old tune expires, the default "ring ring" will be assigned to his/her account. Usually operators notify the subscriber that his/her selected ringback tone is about to expire and will offer a new tune (for a full/reduced price).

These four streams join up to 3 common pricing models:

1) Content fee + Monthly/daily fee:
An AT&T user (for example) is charged $1.99 per tune + additional $0.99 of monthly fee for the Answer Tones service. The monthly fee is charged regardless of the number of Answer Tones ordered.

The benefits of this model are the constant revenue stream & quick return of investment (ROI) coming from the monthly fee. However, setting the right monthly fee is crucial; overcharging will lead to high churn rates.

2) Content fee + Content expiration:
An AMC user (for example) is charged 120 lekë ($1.41 USD) for content fee and the Fun Tune expires after 6 months.

The benefit of this model is the lower user resistance due to the lower (perceived) price for ringback tones. Content expiration increases awareness of the service (subscribers don't hear their own tune and many times they actually forget that they are subscribed to the service) and aims to generate more usage. When the tune expires, users are offered to purchase a new tune. At this point users are actually reminded that they have been subscribed to the ringback tones service which leads to 2 scenarios: a) users choose to opt-in and buy a new tune (i.e. pay the content fee) or b) users are reminded that they have been subscribed to a service that they no longer want and they opt-out. Unfortunately, many users choose to opt out, causing higher service churn rates.

Operators that use this pricing model are strongly recommended to have a good renewal system which offers the user a new tune upon the expiration date and provide an easy and intuitive purchasing experience (usually via SMS with deep linking). The importance of the renewal system is greater as the tune's "shelf life" is shorter. Also, it should be based on intuitive call for action.

3) Content fee + Registration fee:
A Kyivstar user (for example) is charged 7,30 UAH ($1.45 USD) upon joining the D-Jingle service (one time payment for activating the service) + additional 7,30 UAH ($1.45 USD) for each tune. All tunes expire after 3 months.

This model is less popular among operators as it generates lower revenue stream for the operator. Also, at the first purchase, subscriber is charged for two payments (content fee and registration fee) at once, making the perceived price relatively high.

To summarize, each of these models has it advantages and disadvantages but there is no correlation between the pricing model & the ringback tones service take-up; however, there is correlation between price & service take-up, the price is THE "make or break" factor, as you can see in the following diagram:

Correlation_pricing_models_and_pe_3

Effective Pricing - Guidelines:

While there is no single winning recipe for ringback tones pricing, we do have some recommendations and guidelines for effective pricing. First and most important, the ringback tones price should be:

  • Affordable - based on subscribers' capabilities
  • Perceived as fair - compared with other operators & services

How can you make sure the price is affordable and perceived as fair?

Factor

Recommendation

Competitors

Lower or equal to competitors' price

Ringtones

<monthly fee + content fee> should be 30% below or above ringtones price

Monthly ARPU

<monthly fee + content fee> should be lower than 20% of ARPU

Average Prepaid card

Users should be able to pay monthly fee & purchase ringback tones along with their other voice & data expenses

And one last tip: if you don't have it already - create and promote a "promotion" category with a lower price. The promotion items can include the new single the music label is currently promoting, music covers, a discount for the first purchase etc'.

Carnival of Mobilists at VisionMobile

Deals, analysis, locations, phone stuff, widget topics, and more - are covered, and framed by handsome graphics this week at Andreas Constantinou's Carnival #97.

Enjoy!

Coming Soon: Multimadia Ringback Tones

Logo_realReal announced at the CTIA conference it will supply wireless operators with multimedia ringback tones. The Multimedia ringback tone takes the very popular musical ringback tone service to a whole different dimension, from the audio space to the visual video clip arena. It allows you to set a video clip to entertain your callers while waiting you answer their call.

"Building upon Real’s pioneering success in Ringback Tones (RBTs), Real is making Multimedia Ringback (MRB) Services available to mobile operators around the world.  This new 3G mobile service—first launched with Korea’s SK Telecom earlier this year—ushers in a new level of personalization in RBTs, allowing subscribers to incorporate audio, images and video to deliver a unique, customized experience to callers before they are connected."

[via press release]

Related stories: A Jump Into the Future - Multimedia Ringback Tones

The Fun Dial Marketing Seminar - First Coverage

Back in 2002 was the first introduction of customized ringback tones, made by the South Korean operator SK Telecom with its 'Color Ring' ringback tones service. SK Telecom generated over €80 million (US$100 million) in Q2 2002 and has reached 54% of SK Telecom's 18 million subscribers in penetration.

Despite of the cold welcoming of operators in Europe and America, today Ringback Tones is becoming one of the biggest mobile entertainment revenue generators. In some operators Ringback tones are overtaking ringtones sales. In Europe and North America there’s a 60%-80% of Ringback Tone potential end-user-coverage, at least one operator in each Western European country and almost all in North America has already launched the service. Also analysts forecast a substantial ringback tones market growth in the upcoming years.

Rbt_potential_2 

At present, most of the operators are facing various challenges in the way to increase Ringback Tones service penetration, create on going usage of content, increase the awareness and in general turn Ringback tones into a more successful service. Understanding operators' needs and challenges Comverse Fun Dial (Comverse’s Ringback Tone brand) team came up with the idea to hold the second ever marketing seminar focusing the European market. The Fun Dial Seminar brought together leading industry experts, mobile operators, (some that have already launched the service and some which are on the process of launching), as well as content providers, music labels and managed services providers to facilitate an environment of knowledge sharing and to create an open forum to discuss burning issues related to Ringback Tones.

For those of you who weren't able to attent the Seminar, I will cover here some of the study cases presented at the Seminar:

• How to turn the Ringback Tone into a successful service generating significant revenue?
•Case studies of successful Ringback Tone marketing strategies led by mobile operators
• Opening the ringback tones service to 3rd party content providers.

You're welcome to tune in every Tuesday for a part of this series!

Radiohead: Name Your Price for the New Album

The fact that a music band releases its new album as a digital download two months prior to its traditional hard-copy release didn't strike us by surprise. but the news about Radiohead releasing its new album and enabling its listeners to name their own price for downloading the album via its website, is a huge deal!

"There's no label or distribution partner to cut into the band's profits — but then there may not be any profits. Drop In Rainbows' 15 songs into the on-line checkout basket and a question mark pops up where the price would normally be. Click it, and the prompt "It's Up To You" appears. Click again and it refreshes with the words "It's Really Up To You" — and really, it is. It's the first major album whose price is determined by what individual consumers want to pay for it. And it's perfectly acceptable to pay nothing at all."

shortly before the band started writing new songs, singer Thom Yorke told TIME, "I like the people at our record company, but the time is at hand when you have to ask why anyone needs one. And, yes, it probably would give us some perverse pleasure to say 'F*** you' to this decaying business model."

[via Times]

It will be very interesting to see how "naming your own price" will work as Radiohead's business model.

Subscribe to Xellular Identity

  • RSS

    Use this button to subscribe

    By email

    Enter your email



    Powered by FeedBlitz

My Photo

My Social Medias

del.icio.us Digg Facebook LinkedIn MSN Messenger Skype Technorati Twitter Yahoo!

other

  • Add to Technorati Favorites
    Google

    WWW
    xendolev.typepad.com


    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 1.0 License.